Search results
- Dictionaryracket/ˈrakɪt/
noun
- 1. a loud unpleasant noise; a din: "the kids were making a racket" Similar
- 2. an illegal or dishonest scheme for obtaining money: informal "a protection racket" Similar
verb
- 1. make or move with a loud unpleasant noise: "trains racketed by"
- 2. enjoy oneself socially; go in pursuit of pleasure or entertainment: "a fabulous car for racketing around Paris"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
Dec 5, 2018 · Dec 10, 2018 at 14:51. @AlexKnauth Maybe I haven't understood my professor. He said: "Define should be used only to define global variables. To define local variables from a function, let or let * must be used. If not, global variables may interfere with the local functioning of a function." – VansFannel.
Mar 25, 2011 · Your confusion is reasonable: 'let' and 'define' both create new bindings. One advantage to 'let' is that its meaning is extraordinarily well-defined; there's absolutely no disagreement between various Scheme systems (incl. Racket) about what plain-old 'let' means. The 'define' form is a different kettle of fish.
Jan 3, 2014 · If I understand your question correctly, another idiomatic way to do this in Racket would be to use a module. This module could be defined using a separate file:;; foo.rkt #lang racket (define (bar n) (+ n n)) (define foo (bar 1)) (provide foo) ;; use-foo.rkt #lang racket (require "foo.rkt") foo Or via a module form within one file:
Apr 10, 2012 · The fact is that in Racket the preferred programming style is functional as opposed to procedural. In functional programming style variable mutation is discouraged. define-struct is a Racket macro that you use to define 'structure template' along with several other things. For example, if you write: (define-struct coord (x y))
Jun 9, 2019 · 18. In Racket (and other functional programming languages) lambda s are very useful, when you want to pass an in-line, one-shot function as a parameter without defining it first. For example, suppose that we want to square a list of numbers. We can go the long way and define a square function first, and then use map: (define (square x) (* x x))
Jun 12, 2019 · You function defines 2 local functions and then does nothing more. Some Scheme implementations would return "BaNaNa" while others might try to tell that the function does nothing. Racket does this. Also the two local functions are dead code as they are never used and thus was never needed to be defined. (n1! is called by iter, but since iter is ...
Nov 11, 2015 · I just discovered Racket a few days ago, and I'm trying to get more comfortable with it by writing a little script that generates images to represent source code using #lang slideshow. I know that...
Nov 30, 2015 · CONCEPT. First off, the idea of local here (among many other things) is to clarify the meaning of snippets of code. YOUR EXAMPLE. Lets consider your example, you define a local constant called m which appears to be correct. Although, since the letter m has no significant meaning your solution appears to be unclear.
Feb 9, 2017 · Okay, I am new with scheme/racket/lisp. I am practicing creating my own functions, syntax, and recursion, so I want to make my own foldl and foldr functions that do exactly what the predefined versions do. I can't do it because I just don't understand how these functions work. I have seen similar questions on here but I still don't get it.
Aug 21, 2021 · All these are equal. In fact the standard Scheme report explains that the local define can be implemented by rewriting it to a letrec or vice versa. The local version is unique to Racket language and is not a part of Scheme. Eg. if you are writing code that should work across implementations this cannot be used.
