Search results
- Dictionarysubstructure/ˈsʌbˌstrʌktʃə/
noun
- 1. an underlying or supporting structure: "here is a Roman theatre built over barrel-vaulted substructures"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
The first one is an elementary equivalence between a model and its substructure, and thus fits your suggested definition. However, the second one requires one to extend your category of models and consider the category of families of models; from the categorical point of view, you formally add new limits ignoring those limits you already have ...
Feb 4, 2017 · Similarly, it is not clear how to define $\pi$ or indeed any other transcendental hyper-real number while quantifying only over standard numbers. I believe that Tarski's theorem on real-closed fields will prove the positive result for the special case of the question, where $\varphi$ does not use the predicate for the natural numbers (but still has the scope of all quantifiers restricted to ...
$\textbf{Question 1}$ The answer to this question is affirmative. The closure operators that you call good closure operators are normally called algebraic closure operators.
Dec 9, 2015 · Here is the simplest example of a largish cardinal notion. A theorem of Azriel Lévy (see, e.g., Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures (1975), theorem II.3.5 on page 53 and theorem II.9.1 on page 76) states that for every uncountable cardinal κ, if H(κ) is the set of sets hereditarily of cardinality <κ, then H(κ) is a 1 -elementary ...
25. Denote Zermelo Fraenkel set theory without choice by ZF. Is the following true: In ZF, every definable non empty class A has a definable member; i.e. for every class A = {x: ϕ(x)} for which ZF proves "A is non empty", there is a class a = {x: ψ(x)} such that ZF proves "a belongs to A"? Writing "id est" is really really pedantic.
Jan 9, 2018 · Let H have cardinality γ. By assumption we let γ <δ be a Woodin cardinal. The forcing notion which will force ϕ over V is given by the stationary tower forcing. Define the set. Y = {X: X ≺ H(γ +) ∧ | X | = ℵ0}. Define the stationary tower forcing to be the forcing Q <δ = {X: X is stationary and X ∈ Vδ}. The order is defined by X ...
Feb 17, 2021 · Monadic Definability of Ordinals is κ κ. δ δ 2. the function q is a surjection onto δ. no. Proposition: Th(κ,∈) is decidable in PSPACE. Corollary: No pairing function is definable in κ,∈ . References: The elementary theory of well-ordering—a metamathematical study— 10.1016/S0049-237X (08)71988-8.
Proof. I claim that every set will arise in the construction process, because eventually it will become explicitly definable by a formula. In infinitary logic, there are far more than only countably many formulas, and one can cook up a formula to define a specific set, by using the formulas that define its elements.
Berci. 201 1 6. 3. The central unsolved problem of all these "algebraic" definitions of weak omega-categories is to give the right space of morphisms between these objects. The obvious morphisms that preserve all the algebraic structure are typically too strict. If one wants to use them to model weak omega-functors, one needs to have a method ...
A. to be the complement of a disc, boundary included (a non -convex set) and say that x ⌣ y. x ⌣ y. if and only if they are joined by a line segment entirely within A. A. The "transitive" elements here are the points of the circle (everything related to them has to be above the corresponding tangent). Take A.
