Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Dictionary
    ruminative
    /ˈruːmɪnətɪv/

    adjective

    • 1. expressing or involving deep thought: "a deeply ruminative, mysterious lament"

    More definitions, origin and scrabble points

  2. Jun 6, 2024 · The American Psychological Association (APA) defines rumination as “obsessional thinking involving excessive, repetitive thoughts or themes that interfere with other forms of mental...

  3. Jun 6, 2024 · Ruminative thinking typically develops in response to stress, setbacks or even trauma. It’s an attempt to cope and problem solve, to make sense of challenging situations or emotions. You dwell on what went wrong, why it happened, and how to keep from it happening again.

  4. 3 days ago · Rumination generally refers to having repetitive, obsessive, anxious thoughts, which can be a symptom of various mental health disorders. While rumination can be unpleasant to experience, there are often effective methods to break the cycle of obsessive thinking and reduce distress.

  5. Jun 17, 2024 · It is a type of repetitive negative thinking characterized by repeatedly dwelling on negative feelings, situations, or events. Rumination is repetitive and evaluative, meaning that it tends to focus on the causes and consequences of negative stimuli.

  6. Jun 18, 2024 · Ruminating, which refers to the act of continuously thinking about the same thoughts or issues without finding a resolution, can be normal to some extent. Especially during periods of stress, uncertainty or when facing significant life changes. It’s a natural way for the brain to try to process and make sense of complex situations.

  7. Jun 6, 2024 · I’m a clinical psychologist, and I’m going to be explaining the seemingly mysterious phenomenon of crying for no reason. We’ll delve into the possible scientific explanations behind this emotional expression and what it could indicate about mental health.

  8. Jun 12, 2024 · Our automated approach for both sentence parsing and hierarchical clustering tools matched the reliability of human coders. That said, reliability remained moderate for both human and automated coders, suggesting that there is room for improvement in how we define individual units of thought and topic jumps—both conceptually and algorithmically.