Search results
View the profiles of people named Sunil Parkash. Join Facebook to connect with Sunil Parkash and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to...
Brief summary: The defendant-Respondent 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of Joint Hindu family executed an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K No. 238/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at Kaithal for a consideration of Rs 21,400 and received a sum of Rs 5000 as earnest money.
Jun 16, 2022 · Sunil Kumar vs Ram Prakash case held that a coparcener does not have the right to get a permanent injunction against the Karta to prevent him from alienating joint family property. FACTS: Ram Prakash signed into an arrangement with Jai Bhagwan to sell a dwelling property that was represented as a self-acquired property of Ram Prakash.
View Sunil Parkash’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members. Know Your Client (KYC) Associate at Deutsche Bank · An honest, reliable focused and trustworthy...
- 235
- Deutsche Bank
- Holyhead Secondary School
- West Midlands, England, United Kingdom
Sunil Kumar v. Ram Parkash (1988) 2 SCC 77 Family Law-II PSDA Submitted by KANISHKA Enrollment No-Semester-Section-B ##### Vivekananda School of Law and Legal Studies Introduction. − Alienation means transfer of property, such as gifts, sales and mortgages.
- (1)
1,183 Followers, 853 Following, 144 Posts - Sunil perkash (@sunilperkash) on Instagram: "Film Producer. Storyteller. Enchanted. Salt. Disenchanted. Last Survivors."
Sushil Kumar & Anr vs Ram Prakash & Ors on 13 January, 1988. Warning on Translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Issues. Respondent's Arguments. Analysis of the law.
