Search results
A reasonable doubt is not a doubt based upon sympathy or prejudice and, instead, is based on reason and common sense. Reasonable doubt is logically connected to the evidence or absence of evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty.
Apr 30, 2024 · Reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof in criminal cases, meaning that the evidence must establish the defendant's guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Learn how to prove reasonable doubt, the difference between belief and certainty, and the three burdens of proof in criminal law.
- Daniel Liberto
Reasonable doubt is a legal term that means a doubt about the guilt of a criminal defendant that arises or remains upon fair and thorough consideration of the evidence or lack thereof. Learn how to use this term in a sentence and see related articles and entries.
Reasonable Doubts is an American police drama television series created by Robert Singer, which broadcast in the United States by NBC that ran from September 26, 1991, to April 27, 1993.
Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in criminal trials. When a criminal defendant is prosecuted, the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. If the jury—or the judge in a bench trial—has a reasonable doubt as to the defendant's guilt, the jury or judge should pronounce the defendant not guilty.
Reasonable Doubts is a TV series about a deaf prosecutor and a cop who work together to solve crimes in Chicago. The series ran from 1991 to 1993 and starred Mark Harmon, Marlee Matlin, and William Converse-Roberts.
The law requires criminal guilt to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. There are two different approaches to construing this legal rule. On an epistemic approach, the rule is construed in terms of justified belief or knowledge; on a probabilistic approach, the rule is construed in terms of satisfying a probabilistic threshold.
