Search results
- Dictionarymust/mʌst/
modal
- 1. be obliged to; should (expressing necessity): "you must show your ID card"
- 2. expressing an opinion about something that is logically very likely: "there must be something wrong"
noun
- 1. something that should not be overlooked or missed: informal "this video is a must for everyone"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
Apr 18, 2024 · MUST. 1. To express obligation or duty. This also refers to laws and regulations. I must memorize all of these rules about modal verbs. People must remain seated until the show is over. You must wear a seatbelt at all times. 2. To emphasize the necessity of something.
Aug 3, 2023 · Must means that the obligation to do something comes from the speaker. In other words, it’s not a rule. Have to implies that the obligation comes from someone else; it’s something the speaker can’t change.
May 10, 2024 · Must is a modal verb, whereas have to is an auxiliary verb. In this blog post, we’ll solve the mystery of when to use must vs. have to by asking and answering seven simple questions. Contents. 7 Questions for Deciding When To Use “Must” or “Have To” 1. Is the Obligation Internal or External? 2. Are You Using Formal or Informal English? 3.
Jun 1, 2024 · Must: We use “must” when we talk about a requirement or necessity that comes from the speaker or writer themselves. It is a modal verb, carrying a strong sense of personal determination or obligation within a specific context.
Jun 30, 2024 · Auxiliary verbs. Modal auxiliary verbs are a subset of auxiliary verbs, and thus meet the criteria for these. For lists of these criteria, see the article English auxiliary verbs; but among them are that the verbs: (i) can invert with their subjects (notably in questions, Must I go? ), (ii) can be negated with not ( I must not go; Must I not go?
Aug 17, 2023 · Must and have to are both used for obligation, according to Have to, must and should for obligation and advice. However, I have come across to many sources with where they use must have to. On the contrary, my English teacher is highly against it as it sounds redundant in his opinion.
Nov 11, 2023 · From a grammatical standpoint, "must" is a modal verb and doesn't change its form regardless of the subject. For example, it's "She must" and "They must." However, "have to" does change form: "She has to" but "They have to." 15. The negative forms also differ between the two.
Jan 17, 2024 · Both of them are modal auxiliary verbs in English, where modal verbs are used to express ability, necessity, conditionality, possibility, and permission. “Should” is used to express conditionality, whereas “must” is used to express a strong obligation. In this article, we learn about the difference between “should” and ...
Mar 1, 2024 · Sometimes it is better to choose “must” over “have to” or “have to” over “must.” Must. When we use must in spoken English, usually it is to express something we think is likely.
May 8, 2024 · 1. I am a non-native speaker. I understand that both sentences below have the same meaning. However, I feel that the use of the word "must" isn't suitable for a document such as a questionnaire or a step by step guide document. I feel that it sounds more authoritarian and harsh than "required to". Am I correct?
