Search results
- Dictionaryepistemology/ɪˌpɪstəˈmɒlədʒi/
noun
- 1. the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion: "he grappled with metaphysics and epistemology in his writings and sermons"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
In standard philosophical parlance 'epistemology' and 'the theory of knowledge' are convertible, interchangeable. A crack of light might, however, develop between them. 'Epistemology' as practised in philosophy is concerned with questions such as 'how is knowledge of the external world possible ?', 'can we know other minds ?', 'is a priori knowledge possible?'.
Aug 21, 2015 · Epistemology is the study of knowledge, how our brain understands the world, how much of our understanding is credible, etc. Ontology is a description of the world outside (and inside) us, with its objects, particles, waves, living organisms and many other phenomena. Metaphysics is the branch of thinking about what may exist, but we're not sure.
Dec 15, 2020 · Science is a type of knowledge [1], and. Epistemology is the discipline that studies knowledge. Regarding science: Science deals with a specific type of truth: empirical truth. That is far from being the absolute truth, which is more or less the target of philosophy. Empirical truth is anyway essential to our survival, a lot more than absolute ...
Jul 10, 2020 · Epistemic would probably have been more idiomatic in this passage, but I get the impression that the author chose epistemological to emphasize the distinction they are making between what is within the scope of epistemology vs ontology. Page 67; Some philosophers promote ontological vagueness... other philosophers promote epistemic vagueness.
Apr 19, 2018 · What I'm asking is not how to checki "God exists" claim in epistemology, but if it even needs (or should) be considered in the epistemology research, as this belief, contra to many "regular" beliefs, doesn't necessarily claim to provide objective fact that "God exists", but rather many times stays in the single stage of "belief" (meaning, it ...
May 29, 2015 · 2. 'Jobermark' got it right when the question is answered within philosophy of science. Kuhn's revolutionary view of scientific progress is the opposite to the linear view of logical positivists (or logical empiricists). Logical positivist theories (e.g., Carnap's confirmationism and Popper's falsificationism) shared the idea that science ...
Mar 7, 2014 · 1. Materialism does not require "excising phenomenal consciousness" -- consciousness occurs, it just happens to be a characteristic of some types of material processes. – Dave. Mar 7, 2014 at 23:51. You might think about what you mean by “normal theory of knowledge.”. Are you including reliabilism and other externalist theories which are ...
For those philosophers working in the area of epistemology, this would depend entirely on the position taken in epistemology; however, in philosophy in general, many people I think would take either a tacit position towards the nature of reality which is actually entirely consistent with non-philosophical positions, or a tacitly ambiguous, ambivalent, inconsistent or contradictory position ...
In greek philosophy, Plato especially, what is the difference between "gnosis" and "episteme" ? Both apparently designate different types of knowledge, but I couldn't find any precise description ...
May 3, 2018 · Epistemology, as the study of knowledge, would then involve the study of proper justification, or in other words the study of proper justifying, that is, proper reasoning. Hence, logic would be a sub-field of epistemology. The converse, though, is false, since epistemology isn't only about proper reasoning.
