Search results
Jun 16, 2022 · Sunil Kumar vs Ram Prakash case held that a coparcener does not have the right to get a permanent injunction against the Karta to prevent him from alienating joint family property. FACTS: Ram Prakash signed into an arrangement with Jai Bhagwan to sell a dwelling property that was represented as a self-acquired property of Ram Prakash.
Brief summary: The defendant-Respondent 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of Joint Hindu family executed an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K No. 238/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at Kaithal for a consideration of Rs 21,400 and received a sum of Rs 5000 as earnest money.
Sushil Kumar & Anr vs Ram Prakash & Ors on 13 January, 1988. Warning on Translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Issues. Respondent's Arguments. Analysis of the law.
View the profiles of people named Sunil Parkash. Join Facebook to connect with Sunil Parkash and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to...
About. Industry Experience: Senior Strategy Advisor with Zydus Life Sciences Group & Jubilant Bhartia Group, and Director in India’s oldest VC Firm-GVFL Ltd, iCreate and...
- 500+
- World Economic Forum
- IIT Delhi BTech Mech
Sunil Kumar v. Ram Parkash (1988) 2 SCC 77 Family Law-II PSDA Submitted by KANISHKA Enrollment No-Semester-Section-B ##### Vivekananda School of Law and Legal Studies Introduction. − Alienation means transfer of property, such as gifts, sales and mortgages.
Sunil Kumar v. Ram Prakash ( 1988) 2 SCC 77.13. We have perused...
