Search results
Jun 13, 2023 · One of the co-owners of his New York apartments is Mark Scharfman, a notorious landlord who has repeatedly earned media coverage for maltreating tenants and illegally removing apartments from rent regulation.
Aug 23, 2018 · The owner of an estimated 4,000 apartments in the city through his Scharfman Organization, Beach Lane Management, and other holding companies, Scharfman has earned headlines for bringing the Gap...
Feb 4, 2024 · Mark Scharfman, the owner of the buildings and a landlord associated with close to 150 buildings in NYC, many of which are managed under his Beach Lane Property Management Company, has been accused of tax fraud by multiple organizations, serious maltreatment of tenants, and more for years.
Apr 9, 2024 · Scharfman, who owns nearly 150 properties, has been on the Public Advocate's Worst Landlord List, coming in at number 44 in 2021 and number 28 in 2020. At No. 256, he has reportedly been taking tenants to court for eviction for withholding rent during a sewage leak.
- Kushner Vill. 329 E. 9th LLC v. Winker Civil Court New York County, Index No.
- Extell Belnord LLC V Uppman, 113 A.D.3d 1
- Schanzer v. Vendome, 7 Misc 3D 1018A
- 42-44 West 74th Street, LLC v. Savior. Newyork Law Journal 9/29/05
- Riverton v. Knibb, 2005 NYSlipOp 25552
- Cassorla v. Foster, 2 Misc. 3D 65
- 318 East 93, LLC v. Ward, 276 AD2d 277
- Grassini v. Paravalos, 270 AD2d 52
- Stowe v. 19 East 88th Street, Inc., 257 AD2d 355
- 77 Avenue D Associates, Inc. v. DHCR, 249 AD2d 113
Petitioner's Lack of Valid CofO Grants Tenant Dismissal of Non-Payment of Rent Proceeding. Read More: The Real Deal, Judge Grants Kushner Tenants Free Rent at East Village Complex The Law Journal, Kushner Vill 329 E. 9th LLC V. Winker
A successor tenant challenged an unorthodox agreement whereby in 2006, Extell and the Tenants Association, the Belnord Conservancy, agreed to waive the rent regulated tenants’ rights to the protections of the rent regulatory statutes. A unanimous decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the decision of a Supreme Court and dete...
In this Civil Court proceeding, an order issued allowing the tenant to bring the Department of Buildings into an HP proceeding to have serious DOB violations corrected.
Succeeded in having the landlord’s law firm disqualified because they had represented the tenant in another matter, creating a conflict of interest.
This decision is available online (http://www.courts.state.ny.us/Reporter/3dseries/2005/2005_25552.htm), and is notable in that it reversed a controversial decision that was the subject of a front page article in the New York Law Journal. The tenant asserted succession rights, claiming that she was living in the apartment with her grandmother at th...
After winning a long trial where the architect landlord claimed that his building was exempt from rent stabilization because of a “substantial rehabilitation,” we prevailed against the landlord’s appeal.
Successfully defended, in Civil Court and in two appeals, a senior citizen from eviction based upon the claim that her apartment was so cluttered that she could not possibly live there.
Successfully asserted, in Supreme Court and on appeal, a tenant’s claim to rent stabilized status after the tenant was displaced due to a fire.
Prevailed against a cooperative corporation that was refusing to permit the transfer of an apartment to the next of kin of a deceased shareholder.
In this Article 78 proceeding brought by a landlord, we successfully intervened on behalf of the tenants to have a rent overcharge award by the DHCR upheld.
- 217 Broadway, Suite 304 New York, NY, 10007 United States
- info@grimblelaw.com
- (212) 349-0450
Sep 1, 2016 · Residents at the Woodmansten building, 1541-51 Williamsbridge Road, are continuing their battle with real estate mogul Mark Scharfman. On Monday, August 22, residents presented their complaints to Senator Jeff Klein’s office as his representatives went door to door in the building.
Jan 29, 2016 · Mark Scharfman, et al., Court Grants ECBAWM’s Clients’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Most Significant Claims in the Complaint. January 29, 2016. ECBAWM won an important victory on January 27, 2016, in a partnership dispute that is pending in New York Supreme Court, NWM Capital v.
