Search results
Oct 24, 2021 · Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh & Ors., the Bombay High Court held that both those who are creative (authors of literary, musical, dramatic, or artistic work) or those who finance creativity (sound recording and cinematography) including companies and partnership firms, etc are authors under the statute.
- Lokesh Vyas
Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh. Smart Summary (Beta) Facts. The plaintiff, Ramesh Sippy, has filed a suit claiming to be the author and first owner of the copyright and Author's Special Rights in the film titled "Sholay" ("the said film Sholay") and four other films. Issue.
Feb 3, 2006 · Shaan Ranjit Uttamsingh and Sameer, were arrested on Wednesday for assaulting a businessman's son inside the pub.
Aug 4, 2015 · Shaan Ranjeet Uttam Singh and Ors.when the High Court laid down two important principles. Firstly, the conduct of the party is relevant when copyright is asserted after a long duration from the work being first created. Secondly, the authorship of a work comes into existence only upon completion of the work.
Jul 5, 2012 · Ramesh, who had moved the court against Suresh and nephews Shaan and Sameer Uttamsingh (sons of his late sister) through his lawyer Bachubhai Munim and counsel Navroz Seervai, said he owned flat 5B.
Jan 2, 2014 · Ramesh Sippy vs Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh . on 2 January, 2014. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. [Cites 0, Cited by 3] Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query ( Query Alert ...
Apr 1, 2013 · The Plaintiff – Ramesh Sippy has filed the above suit claiming to be the author and first owner of the copyright and also to the Author's Special Rights in the film titled “Sholay” (“the said film Sholay”) and other four films viz. (i) Seeta aur Geeta, (ii) Saagar, (iii) Shaan and (iv) Andaz (“the said other films”).
