Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Addresses fundamental questions about Dawkins’ approach to science and religion: Is the gene actually selfish? Is the blind watchmaker a suitable analogy? Are there other ways of looking at things?

  2. Nov 1, 2004 · Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life. Alister E. McGrath. 3.65. 297 ratings33 reviews. Alister E. McGrath is one of the world’s leading theologians, with a doctorate in the sciences. Richard Dawkins is one of the bestselling popular science writers, with outspoken and controversial views on religion.

    • (296)
    • Paperback
  3. Nov 30, 2004 · "Alister McGrath's book Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes and the Meaning of Life does a fair and sophisticated job of summarising my position." –Richard Dawkins, Times Higher Education Supplement "Wielding evolutionary arguments and carefully chosen metaphors like sharp swords, Richard Dawkins has emerged over three decades as this generation's ...

    • (59)
  4. Nov 1, 2019 · Dawkins' God : genes, memes, and the meaning of life. by. McGrath, Alister E., 1953-. Publication date. 2005. Topics. Dawkins, Richard, 1941-, Apologetics. Publisher. Malden, MA : Blackwell Pub.

  5. Nov 30, 2004 · Addresses fundamental questions about Dawkins’ approach to science and religion: Is the gene actually selfish? Is the blind watchmaker a suitable analogy? Are there other ways of looking at...

    • illustrated, reprint
    • Alister E. McGrath
    • Wiley, 2004
  6. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Dawkins'_GodDawkins' God - Wikipedia

    Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life is a book by Alister McGrath, a theologian who is currently Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University. The book, published in 2004, with a second edition in 2015, aims to refute claims about religion made by another well-known professor at Oxford, Richard Dawkins .

  7. Dawkins' God : genes, memes, and the meaning of life | WorldCat.org. Author: Alister E. McGrath. Summary: Alister McGrath subjects the atheistic world-view of Richard Dawkins to critical analysis and finds it lacking in intellectual rigour.