Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Erwin Chemerinsky (born May 14, 1953) is an American legal scholar known for his studies of constitutional law and federal civil procedure. Since 2017, Chemerinsky has been the dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Previously, he was the inaugural dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law from 2008 to 2017.

  2. www.law.berkeley.edu › faculty-profiles › erwin-chemerinskyErwin Chemerinsky - Berkeley Law

    Erwin Chemerinsky became the 13th Dean of Berkeley Law on July 1, 2017, when he joined the faculty as the Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law. Prior to assuming this position, from 2008-2017, he was the founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at University of California, ...

  3. Apr 10, 2024 · I am deeply saddened by these events and take solace that it is just a small number of our students who would behave in such a clearly inappropriate manner. Erwin. Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law. University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Updated April 13, 2024.

  4. Erwin Chemerinsky is a renowned constitutional law scholar and the 13th Dean of Berkeley Law. He is the author of twelve books, a frequent op-ed writer, and a Supreme Court advocate.

  5. Erwin Chemerinsky. University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Verified email at law.berkeley.edu - Homepage. constitutional law. Title. Sort. Sort by citations Sort by year Sort by title. Cited by.

  6. May 3, 2022 · Erwin Chemerinsky is a renowned constitutional law scholar and a frequent Supreme Court advocate. He is the dean and the Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law at Berkeley Law, and a member of the ACS Board of Academic Advisors.

  7. Sep 6, 2022 · In his new book, Worse Than Nothing, Chemerinsky argues that originalism is a flawed and dangerous method of constitutional interpretation that undermines key rights. He cites several Supreme Court cases that would have been decided differently under originalism and warns of the implications for the future of constitutional rights.