Search results
Jul 29, 2021 · Sugandhi (Dead) and Another v/s P. Rajkumar. LawFoyer. 29 July 2021. Case Analysis. 0 Comments. 12 mins read. By – Devanshi Srivastava. In The Supreme Court of India. Abstract. Fair and Just Procedural Methods are essential in providing the best judicial results.
Sugandhi (Dead) by Lrs. and Another _______________ Appellant (s); v. P. Rajkumar Rep. by his Power Agent Imam Oli _________ Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 3427 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 16491 of 2019], decided on October 13, 2020. The Order of the court was delivered by.
May 20, 2022 · Challenging the decision of the Division Bench the State of Himachal Pradesh preferred a Special Leave Petition before this Court, from which the present Civil Appeal arises pursuant to leave being granted on 08.11.2011.
Aug 30, 2022 · Order of Hon`ble Supreme Court of India in - Civil Appeal No.5247/2022-SEBI Vs. Rajkumar Nagpal & Ors.- Judgment dated 30.08.2022
Feb 5, 2020 · The Supreme Court in the matter of Gurudwara Sahib Vs. Gram Panchayat Village Sirthala reported in 2014(3) MPLJ 36 has settled that declaratory decree based on plea of adverse possession cannot be claimed and adverse possession can be used only as shield in defence by the defendant.
Sugandhi v. P. Rajkumar. Smart Summary (Beta) Facts. The appellants are the defendants in the suit, OS No. 257 of 2014, on the file of the Principal Sub-Judge, Pudukottai. The respondent is the plaintiff who filed the suit for injunction alleging that the defendants are attempting to grab the suit schedule property.
Oct 13, 2020 · The appellants herein are the defendants in the suit, O.S. No.257 of 2014, on the file of the Principal SubJudge, Pudukottai, and the respondent is the plaintiff. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to in their respective positions before the Trial Court.
