Search results
Brief summary: The defendant-Respondent 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of Joint Hindu family executed an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K No. 238/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at Kaithal for a consideration of Rs 21,400 and received a sum of Rs 5000 as earnest money.
View the profiles of people named Sunil Parkash. Join Facebook to connect with Sunil Parkash and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to...
Jun 16, 2022 · Sunil Kumar vs Ram Prakash case held that a coparcener does not have the right to get a permanent injunction against the Karta to prevent him from alienating joint family property. FACTS: Ram Prakash signed into an arrangement with Jai Bhagwan to sell a dwelling property that was represented as a self-acquired property of Ram Prakash.
Sushil Kumar & Anr vs Ram Prakash & Ors on 13 January, 1988. Warning on Translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Issues. Respondent's Arguments. Analysis of the law.
1,183 Followers, 853 Following, 144 Posts - Sunil perkash (@sunilperkash) on Instagram: "Film Producer. Storyteller. Enchanted. Salt. Disenchanted. Last Survivors."
View the profiles of professionals named "Sunil Parkash" on LinkedIn. There are 2 professionals named "Sunil Parkash", who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ideas, and...
Sunil Kumar v. Ram Prakash ( 1988) 2 SCC 77.13. We have perused...
