Search results
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design (ID), ultimately found by the court to not be science.
Dec 20, 2005 · Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. Download. PDF. Check. Treatment. Summary. viewing curriculum of intelligent design from the perspective of schoolchildren for purposes of determining Establishment Clause violation. Summary of this case from Skoros v. City of New York. See 2 Summaries.
Mar 10, 2005 · On December 14, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendants, Dover Area School District and Dover Area School District Board of Directors (collectively "Defendants" or "DASD"), in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Aug 2, 2005 · Tammy KITZMILLER, et al. Plaintiffs v. DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and Dover Area School District Board of Directors, Defendants. No. 04CV2688. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. August 2, 2005.
Mar 16, 2008 · On February 21, 2006, the newly elected Dover Area School Board voted, unanimously with one abstention, to pay $1,000,011 in legal fees and damages due to the parents and their lawyers as a result of the verdict in the case, a large sum of money for a small district.
5 days ago · In Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (M.D. Pa. 2005), a judge ruled that requiring teachers to teach both Intelligent Design and evolution violated the First Amendment.
Nov 23, 2005 · The ACLU led a lawsuit against the Dover Area School Board for promoting intelligent design, a religious view, in public school science classes. The lawsuit resulted in a historic decision that rejected intelligent design as unconstitutional and scientifically invalid.
