Search results
Jul 9, 2007 · The appellate Court has jurisdiction to reverse or affirm the findings of the trial court. Respondent No.1-Shami Mohd. has failed to establish that the sale deed in favour of the appellant-Jamila Begum is vitiated by undue influence or fraud.
Jamila Begum (D) thr. L.Rs. v. Shami Mohd. (D) thr. L.Rs. and Ors. AIR 2019 SC 72/ MANU/SC/1488/2018. Mohammedan Law. Gift – Oral gift under Mohammedan law is valid – Burden of Proof is on the donee.
Dec 14, 2018 · Appellant-Jamila Begum has also been exercising her right of ownership over the suit house by filing eviction petition against other tenants. In his evidence, plaintiff-Shami Mohd. has stated that appellant-Jamila Begum had also filed suit for eviction of tenant Sher Ali and other tenants viz. Imtiaz and Binda.
2019(1) Jamila Begum Vs Shami Mohd. 643. Rajiv Shivji Sharma was indeed the Proprietor of the appellant. This is an attempt to demonstrate that the complaint was filed by an authorised person. The appellant has failed to make out a case for adducing additional evidence at this stage.
View the profiles of professionals named "Jamila Begum" on LinkedIn. There are 60+ professionals named "Jamila Begum", who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ideas, and...
View Jamila Begum’s profile on LinkedIn, the world’s largest professional community. Jamila’s education is listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Jamila’s...
- 2 followers
Nov 28, 2018 · JAMILA BEGUM (D) THR. LRS. Appellant(s) VERSUS. SHAMI MOHD. & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 28-11-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE. For Appellant(s) Mr. R.B. Singhal,Sr.Adv.
