Search results
- Dictionaryreduce/rɪˈdjuːs/
verb
- 1. make smaller or less in amount, degree, or size: "the need for businesses to reduce costs" Similar Opposite
- 2. bring someone or something to (a worse or less desirable state or condition): "she has been reduced to near poverty" Similar
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
Dec 30, 2012 · As described in the docs: Apply a function against an accumulator and each value of the array (from left-to-right) as to reduce it to a single value. Here's an example which sums up the values of an array: let total = [0, 1, 2, 3].reduce((accumulator, currentValue) => accumulator + currentValue); console.log(total);
Oct 9, 2014 · a/ (b/c) = (ac)/b ≠ (a/b)/c. For division and subtraction, you probably want a left-associative reduce. Those actually happen to be a bit more efficient in Scheme, since they can be implemented tail-recursively, and so use less stack space. (define (reduce fn init list)
Oct 2, 2022 · Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Please be sure to answer the question.Provide details and share your research!
l = reduce(xor, [1,2,3,4]) NameError: name 'reduce' is not defined Tried printing reduce into interactive console - got this error: NameError: name 'reduce' is not defined
Jan 30, 2012 · 188. Fold takes an explicit initial value for the accumulator while reduce uses the first element of the input list as the initial accumulator value. This means the accumulator and therefore result type must match the list element type, whereas they can differ in fold as the accumulator is provided separately.
exactly, i was using this in keys that has beet retrieved from mongo model, and i passed an empty object as an initial value to the result of reduce of keys, and as much as i was using @babel/plugin-proposal-object-rest-spread plugin , i was spread the accumulator value in return of reduce and it works like a charm, but i was wondere if im doing something wrong, be cause i was passing the ...
Aug 6, 2019 · 63. If you want the accumulator value to be indexable by string, Record<string, string> should do the trick. You can pass this as the type argument to reduce. [key: string]: number; small: 576, medium: 768, large: 992, extra: 1200. acc[cur] = `(min-width: ${size[cur]}px)`;
Nov 8, 2013 · def __reduce__(self): # we return a tuple of class_name to call, # and optional parameters to pass when re-creating. return (self.__class__, (self._file_name_we_opened, )) my_test = Test() saved_object = pickle.dumps(my_test) # Just print the representation of the string of the object, # because it contains newlines.
It is sometimes useful to know the protocol version when implementing __reduce__. This can be done by implementing a method named __reduce_ex__ instead of __reduce__. __reduce_ex__, when it exists, is called in preference over __reduce__ (you may still provide __reduce__ for backwards compatibility). The __reduce_ex__ method will be called with ...
Dec 13, 2019 · Passing in the type to the reduce function array.reduce<T>(...) was all I needed, as the rest of the type inferences worked flawlessly. TS was still inferring the accumulator's type as the array type, (even when typing the initialValue like the first answer) until I did this.
