Search results
2. "Changes to" is a better choice because you are listing the new hours. "Changes from" would be more appropriate if you listed the old hours. – Rocky. Dec 1, 2014 at 18:09. In either case it would be better to display the old hours and indicate the special not-permanent holiday hours as changes. One sentence does not do the same job as a ...
Aug 13, 2017 · Changes to hydrology and landscapes in wetlands can alter the population dynamics of waterbirds. There is the implication of an outer hand that is making these changes or alterations and the tone is somewhat of a warning. Hydrological and landscape changes in wetlands can alter the population dynamics of waterbirds.
3. The two possibilities use the word "change" in different senses, and both are grammatically correct. "Change" can refer to mutability in general, such as when we say, "change is the only constant", or, "change is necessary". It can also be a count noun, such as, "costume changes", or, "some changes are necessary".
Mar 6, 2011 · 4. If all the corrections are a part of a larger purpose, or a series of steps to one end- the singular form is appropriate. However, several unconnected changes or corrections shall use the plural form of the word. Share.
From a semantic point of view, though, minimal changes is far more common. COCA shows just two results for minimum changes vs. at least 23 for minimal changes: Consent will decrease and the bargain become unstable when the definition of the minimum changes or when the capacity exists to achieve better terms. Chicago Sun-Times
Sep 11, 2015 · I read an article that says, "Merkel's smiling asylum-seeker selfies are a lighthearted manifestation of a serious shift in her approach to dealing with refugees in Germany." I thought that "shift"
Dec 7, 2015 · War never changes a conviction. War never changes any man's honest sentiment. We accept the result of the civil war." The principal topic of conversation during the evening was the proposed erection of a monument to Gen. Winfield S. Hancock, in New Orleans, by the Confederate Veterans of the United States.
Mar 21, 2019 · The use of the word “new” is largely redundant. The word “changes” states that there is something different, probably new. The possibility of old exists, but is fairly remote. My conclusion is that it is not redundant. If you consider something that is "new", then it has not been previously existed.
0. There's not much difference in meaning. Maybe 'to how' is more pro-active and 'in how' is less so. 'to' sounds more immediate and is more usual. 'in' sounds (subtlely) like a more long term thing. I'd go for 'to how'. Share. Improve this answer. Follow. answered Dec 15, 2016 at 23:23. zzephyrs.
Mar 14, 2017 · This principle can be applied to a variety of economic, business and financial information, such as shifts in the gross domestic product (GDP) or changes in security prices, but it is not used in reference to normal market fluctuations that are not the result of an event.
