Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 27, 2020 · Aug 28, 2020. #3. lingobingo said: No. Classified as is correct. It’s similar to described as or categorised as. Into would need a different verb, such as sorted or grouped into classes/categories. I found the following information on the website and I am a little big confused.

  2. Oct 16, 2018 · Fresno CA. English (US - northeast) Oct 16, 2018. #2. In my opinion "into" is correct, and "in" is a sloppy replacement for "into". I don't think "in" has a different meaning. But I dislike this sentence, because it uses 2 different words (class/category) with identical meanings. That may confuse readers.

  3. Jan 6, 2010 · They are intended for different purposes. For example, segmentation partitions the original data into fragments; clustering forms the homogeneous groups of these fragments, etc. These tasks are carried out independently and at different stages of dataset processing. My sentence is: "DM tasks can be classified + preposition + segmentation ...

  4. Sep 8, 2008 · Sep 8, 2008. #1. Hello. The following sentences are from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. - Participants were categorized according to age. - His latest work cannot be categorized as either a novel or an autobiography. - The books in the library are classified according to subject. - Patients are classified into three categories.

  5. Dec 9, 2018 · Hello everybody. Hope you are doing well. Today I came across a sentence taken from a book which arouse a question in my mind. The sentence is "A way to measure whether our algorithm is doing a good job could be, for instance, the percentage of points that are being correctly classified." My...

  6. May 1, 2020 · May 1, 2020. #4. In this example they're the same, because of the two groups you've chosen. 'Into' is about what kind of groups you use: you can classify things into three groups, or classify them into their orders and families. Here you're not saying what the groups are, just which groups cover the things. 'As' is more specific.

  7. Apr 1, 2014 · Chinese. Apr 1, 2014. #1. It seems ”goods” cannot be preceded by a quantity such as “one goods” or “two goods”, so in regards to this it should be classified as uncountable noun. But I read in many places, goods are used with plural form verbs such as “are” and when plural form verb is used it cannot be regarded as a uncountable ...

  8. Dec 28, 2005 · Senior Member. stargazer said: Yes. Usually, when a food is described as being rich, it contains butter, cream and other items that give the food a rich or "heavy" consistency. Usually, this means it is also "rich" in flavor, so much that a little bit (or bite!) goes a long way. In other words, you can get full after eating just a small portion.

  9. May 15, 2012 · Has anyone heard of this type of defense or have a good idea for a concise translation? Meaning of the phrase: If a person proves that he gave, distributed or possessed with intent to give or distribute a controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II only as an accommodation to another individual who is not an inmate in a correctional facility, and did so without having the intent to profit.

  10. Aug 21, 2011 · gengo said: I own an air rifle and have used them my whole life, and I have never heard a BB gun called an air rifle, even though technically it is classified as an air gun. Wikipedia says "The term BB gun is often incorrectly used to describe a pellet or air gun." A pellet gun is commonly called an air rifle, but a BB gun is not.

  1. People also search for